Home > > Advantages and disadvantages Osseointegration

Advantages and disadvantages Osseointegration

Author: Minnie

Apr. 29, 2024

5 0

Advantages and disadvantages Osseointegration

Advantages and disadvantages

Osseointegration

Are you interested in learning more about steel prosthetic leg? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

Advantages

An osseointegrated prosthesis offers many advantages to individuals with an arm or leg amputation compared with a socket prosthesis (which fits over the stump of the amputated leg or arm). The attachment of the osseointegrated prosthesis is much more stable and provides a full range of joint movement, making walking much easier. An osseointegrated prosthesis does not cause pain or skin breakdown when used. Because the prosthesis is directly attached to the bone, the wearer feels as though their prosthesis is part of their own body by a process known as “natural osseoperception” (i.e. it feels as though it is their own leg or arm). Since 2009, the Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc) in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, has been offering this highly innovative technique which significantly improves the quality of life of individuals with an amputation.

In 2011, the Radboudumc carried out a study of the first 22 patients to be given an osseointegrated prosthesis at their centre. Aspects of walking and quality of life with the osseointegrated prosthesis were compared with a socket prosthesis. It was found that prosthesis use increased from 56 to 101 hours per week, walking speed increased by 32% and walking required 18% less energy with the osseointegrated prosthesis. Prosthesis-related quality of life improved from 39 to 62 on a scale of 0 to 100.

Advantages of an osseointegrated prosthesis
  • Increased prosthetic use
  • Longer walking distances
  • Full range of joint movement
  • Better sitting comfort
  • No skin problems
  • Stable and safer standing and sitting
  • A sense of the artificial limb belonging to the body
  • Easy and quick attachment and removal
  • Improved quality of life.

Disadvantages

Osseointegration is a safe treatment, and inflammation of the bone is rare. A disadvantage is that the area where the implant enters the skin (called the “stoma”) has to be cleaned twice daily with soap and water. This is comparable with brushing the teeth. In some cases, the skin around the stoma may become irritated. In the first year after implantation, intense muscle pain may be felt. This muscle pain disappears as soon as the stump muscles become fitter and stronger.
 

An osseointegrated prosthesis offers many advantages to individuals with an arm or leg amputation compared with a socket prosthesis (which fits over the stump of the amputated leg or arm). The attachment of the osseointegrated prosthesis is much more stable and provides a full range of joint movement, making walking much easier. An osseointegrated prosthesis does not cause pain or skin breakdown when used. Because the prosthesis is directly attached to the bone, the wearer feels as though their prosthesis is part of their own body by a process known as “natural osseoperception” (i.e. it feels as though it is their own leg or arm). Since 2009, the Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc) in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, has been offering this highly innovative technique which significantly improves the quality of life of individuals with an amputation.In 2011, the Radboudumc carried out a study of the first 22 patients to be given an osseointegrated prosthesis at their centre. Aspects of walking and quality of life with the osseointegrated prosthesis were compared with a socket prosthesis. It was found that prosthesis use increased from 56 to 101 hours per week, walking speed increased by 32% and walking required 18% less energy with the osseointegrated prosthesis. Prosthesis-related quality of life improved from 39 to 62 on a scale of 0 to 100.Osseointegration is a safe treatment, and inflammation of the bone is rare. A disadvantage is that the area where the implant enters the skin (called the “stoma”) has to be cleaned twice daily with soap and water. This is comparable with brushing the teeth. In some cases, the skin around the stoma may become irritated. In the first year after implantation, intense muscle pain may be felt. This muscle pain disappears as soon as the stump muscles become fitter and stronger.

Making Prosthetics More Lifelike

David Brockman, a retired CalFire captain and avid outdoorsman, built a deck in the backyard of his home last year, without the use of his dominant right hand, which he lost in an accident. The prosthetic hand he used instead was a crude but functional steel hook-and-harness device.

Brockman has tried other artificial limbs, including a high-tech prosthesis called a myoelectric. It looks like a hand and works by using electrical signals from muscles in the forearm. But that one just didn’t work for him.

“It’s uncomfortable, and it doesn’t function well,” Brockman said. “It looks nice. It’ll open and close, and I don’t have to wear a harness. But to be what I am — very physical — and to be outside working in the yard, raking, doing things like that, it doesn’t work.”

David Brockman, a retired firefighter and hand amputee, shows off his new myoelectric prosthetic device. UC Davis surgeons performed targeted muscle reinnervation surgery and used smart prosthetics to provide better muscle control, improved sensory feedback and less limb pain for amputees. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

Rejecting his myoelectric wasn’t unusual. Despite the advancements in robotics and other high-tech prosthetics, a recent study found that 44% of arm amputees abandon their devices.

“Even though there’s amazing dexterous devices that can move in all sorts of ways and look similar and operate similar to an intact limb, being able to tell all of that robotic system how to move and what you want it to do is really where a big barrier is currently in the field,” said Jonathon Schofield, assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at UC Davis.

Schofield is part of a team of engineers, scientists and surgeons at UC Davis working to make life easier for amputees through a combination of surgery, advanced machine learning and smart prosthetics. Their goal is “prosthesis embodiment,” to get these devices to mimic a biological limb so amputees gain better muscle control and sensory feedback without increased complexity.

“We’re trying to fill that gap,” Schofield said. “We’re asking how can we allow someone to think about making a pinching motion or think about making a fist with their missing hand and just let the prosthetic limb do that for them.”

Advancing Prosthetics in the Lab at UC Davis

Brockman is taking part in an experiment to help the UC Davis group and other researchers advance prosthetics. He now has a new myoelectric prosthetic hand, one much closer to the real thing. It looks like a glove and its fingers can move independently.

Brockman said the new prosthetic hand will make a huge difference in his life.

“For me, I love the outdoors. This is a dream come true because I’ll be able to grab my fishing pole and reel and grab things again instead of trying to hook it and it keeps slipping off,” he said.

Advanced prosthetics difficult to operate

But myoelectric devices, which use muscle activity from the remaining limb to operate, still require a lot of effort to get them to work, said Laduan Smedley, a certified prosthetist orthotist at UC Davis Health.

“I describe it somewhat like Morse code,” Smedley said. “Amputees have to memorize these kinds of patterns of flexion and extension or co-contraction to operate the hand.”

One of the newer myoelectric prosthetic hands sits on a workshop table at UC Davis Health. The smarter prosthetic operates like a bionic hand, with five fingers that can move independently. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis) UC Davis Health certified prosthetist orthotist Laduan Smedley is making sure the sleeve of David Brockman’s prosthetic hand fits correctly. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

Some of the more advanced myoelectric hands are more intuitive but require a smartphone app to select the desired type of grasp, such as pinching or gripping.

The UC Davis research group wants to incorporate what scientists know about how humans learn and control movement, said Wilsaan Joiner, a neuroscientist and professor in the Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior in the College of Biological Sciences.

“If you’re not utilizing what is a natural ability or natural infrastructure of our motor system to control an external device, it’s probably going to be incredibly difficult and nonintuitive to learn how to do,” Joiner said.

Read more stories on how UC Davis confronts today's most challenging health problems.

Amputations improved by targeted muscle reinnervation

Surgeons have led the way to make myoelectric devices easier to use. Not long ago, the standard amputation could still leave patients in a lot of pain. Surgeons cut bone, muscle and nerves to remove a limb. They buried those nerves under muscle or in bone to prevent their endings from growing toward the surface of the skin.

“The idea was that if you bury it far away from the skin then patients don’t get pain,” said Clifford Pereira, an associate professor in the Department of Surgery at UC Davis Health. “We found that despite doing that, people still get chronic pain and phantom pain.”

Related articles:
Ambroise Paré IV: The early history of artificial limbs (from ...
Which Hospital Bed is Suitable for your Loved Ones?

For more information, please visit carbon fiber prosthetic leg.

Phantom pain can feel like cramps or burning where the limb used to be. Many patients still develop neuromas, where nerves can grow to form a lump of painful disorganized nerve tissue. The pain from neuromas can also make wearing a prosthetic device impossible.

Surgeon Andrew Li shakes the prosthetic hand of former patient David Brockman, a retired fire captain, who had targeted muscle re-innervation surgery on his amputated hand. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis) Cliff Pereira and Andrew Li are both with the Department of Surgery at UC Davis Health. They have performed targeted muscle re-innervation surgery to help amputees control prosthetic limbs more intuitively. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

Recently, UC Davis surgeons began using a procedure called targeted muscle re-innervation, or TMR. The surgery reroutes severed nerves so that signals from the brain that once controlled the missing limb are picked up by a nearby muscle.

Pereira said it’s like converting a dumb muscle into a smarter muscle. Amputees only need to think about making a fist or opening their fingers for the movement to occur.  

“It was originally done to increase the number of muscle signals that a patient could generate after an amputation so there could be more degrees of control of a prosthetic device,” said Andrew Li, an assistant professor in the Department of Surgery at UC Davis Health. “An unintended benefit was that those patients also tended to have reduced phantom pain and neuroma pain as well.”

Advancing Prosthetics in the Hospital at UC Davis Health

Artificial intelligence now used in prosthetic technology

Brockman had TMR surgery at UC Davis Health and is now using a smarter prosthetic device.

“They actually call it a bionic hand,” Brockman said. “It’s a working, functional hand. It has five fingers. It’s got like 13 sensors built into the sleeve. And it works off a muscle reaction in my arm. So, when I twitch my thumb nerve, which is still there, the prosthetic senses that and the thumb will move.”

The prosthetic hand must first learn how to read these signals. This is where artificial intelligence, or AI, plays a role.

The UC Davis researchers are examining the muscle firing patterns of Brockman and others who have had TMR surgery.

Neuroscientist Wilsaan Joiner points to an ultrasound machine. Scientists are using both ultrasound and electromyography, combined with AI, to make prosthetics easier to control. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis) Engineer Jonathon Schofield, left, and neuroscientist Wilsaan Joiner, right, are both working to make prosthetic limbs more intuitive by incorporating what scientists know about how humans learn and control movement. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

Inside a UC Davis lab, Schofield attached electrodes to Brockman’s forearm using an electromyography machine, which records the muscle’s electrical activity. He asked Brockman to make several different hand gestures, and the computer’s programming begins to recognize those patterns.

Electromyography can sometimes confuse electrical signals from other muscles, so the scientists are also using ultrasound machines that use sound waves to produce images. When Brockman contracts a muscle, it becomes denser and bounces back more sound.

The researchers are combining all this technology and data with AI in the hope that prosthetics will become more intuitive for the user. 

“We’re leveraging artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms that are looking at the muscles that remain in that person’s residual limb,” Schofield said. “It’s learning what that activity looks like when amputees wanted to pinch or make a fist or make a pointing motion.”

Can prosthetics ‘feel?’

Surgeons are hoping to advance prosthesis embodiment by enabling users who lost their sensory nerves to gauge temperature and pressure. They may be able to do with sensory nerves what they did with motor nerves in the targeted muscle re-innervation surgery — connect the severed ones with those in the overlying skin. If the artificial hand is touched or gets hot, it sends that signal to the skin of the amputee.

Amputees also have difficulty sensing body position and movement with a prosthetic device. But researchers said one way to overcome that is to integrate prosthetic devices into the body, like a human machine. The concept, called osseointegration, is the next step in smart prosthetics.

Peyton Young, a UC Davis Ph.D. candidate in Jonathon Schofield’s lab, demonstrates how electromyography works using a robotic arm. The robotic arm recognizes the electrical signals from his forearm muscles and it moves accordingly. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

“Osseointegration is making the prosthetic device essentially heal into the bone and become a weight bearing proprioceptive structure,” said Li, the UC Davis hand surgeon. “You can still take it off, but it’s much more a solid component of your body that could potentially make things a lot more intuitive, a lot more natural, like picking up heavy things, doing pull-ups potentially.”

The Integrum OPRA osseointegrated implant for above knee amputations is Food and Drug Administration approved and allows direct integration between bone and the surface of a prosthetic device. UC Davis is now actively recruiting patients for the surgery.

David Brockman with his wife, Tereasa Brockman, at UC Davis after David had a fitting for his prosthetic hand. (Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis)

Related Stories 

Novel surgery provides better muscle control, improved sensory feedback and less limb pain.

Clifford Pereira (Plastic Surgery), Gavin Pereira (Orthopedic Surgery) and Jonathon Schofield (College of Engineering) invented and successfully tested a novel device to reconnect blood vessels for revascularization during surgery.

 

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit carbow foot.

Comments

0